After images in a folder are catalogued, even those currently “offline” (on DVD, for example) can be located and identified by a thumbnail in the library and their secret location revealed to you. It is a powerful database that works with your existing folder structure and storage system. Or was an image relegated to CD or DVD rather than being worthy of room on the hard drives? There are asset management programs devoted to cataloging images, but I never quite got around to using them. Did I file it under the location or by subject? So many images could be filed under several categories, but doing so would waste disk space and if I modified one copy the others would not be synchronized. But it can be a chore to locate a specific image. I have a bank of large hard drives (with backups) where files are organized in a subject-related folder structure. Image DatabaseI have to admit I have been remiss about image organization. You can also group chosen images across folders into collections. These can be brought in from your image storage drives or disks as well as from a card. After doing work in Photoshop I can be seamlessly returned to Lightroom where my changed images will be updated.The powerful workflow management of Lightroom begins with downloading images, which are imported into the catalog. (I always wanted two enlargers anyway…) It won’t replace Photoshop for me, but it will be a powerful front end, strongly supplementing Bridge (with much more functionality) and giving me the choice of doing RAW conversions in either Lightroom or Adobe Camera Raw. The bottom line: I like what I found and it now has a place in my “dimroom” somewhat like a second enlarger. But the recent buzz got me interested and I decided to check it out again. I always thought I was in that category and had not previously used Lightroom beyond checking out the trial version when it came out in 2007. Those who work up only a few images from a shoot and do a lot of artistic manipulation may not find a compelling need for Lightroom. Then it handles slideshow presentation to a client, uploading to a web site for client review and printing.Photographers who do extensive artistic adjustments on images will still want to work in Photoshop after organizing and making initial adjustments in Lightroom, to use such things as filters, layer compositing and masking. Lightroom handles downloading, previewing, rating, organizing, keywording and RAW conversion. It is particularly suitable for photojournalists and photographers who do stock, commercial work, sports, weddings and events, for whom a fast and efficient workflow for hundreds of images from a single shoot is critical. Photoshop or Lightroom?While Photoshop has many tools for graphic art and web design, Lightroom is targeted specifically at the needs of photographers, both in workflow and image adjustments. Catalog data written to one platform can be imported into the other, so a notebook computer running one platform can be used to catalog images as cards are downloaded in the field and back home the data can be imported to a desktop running the other platform. Both versions are on the same installation disk and if you have both PC and Mac computers you can install it on both. Here’s what I found.Lightroom is in the same class as Apple Aperture, but while Aperture runs only on Macs, Lightroom runs on both Mac and PC platforms. I recently got hold of Lightroom 2 and put it through its paces. For some users it might replace Photoshop and for others it could be a supplement. Even though Photoshop appears in the name, it is a separate program from Adobe Photoshop CS3 although the two are tightly integrated. There has been a great deal of interest in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, which has just (August 2008) been upgraded to Version 2. For example, if the scan has a pixel near the edge that’s 1% different than the rest of the background, Trim will stop there, so there will be untrimmed space remaining between that pixel and the photo.Find out what all the fuss is about. But the background must be the exact same solid color. You can set it up to trim all pixels of the same color inward from any side or all sides, stopping at the edge of the photo. Yes, if you have a single image with a uniform background, you can choose Image > Trim (same link as above, but near the top of the page). It will split them out into multiple I do one at a time, does Photoshop or any other CC app have a way to auto crop out the extended white areas of which can probably also work in batch processing? Yes, when you have a single document containing multiple images surrounded by white space, try the Photoshop command File > Automate > Crop and Straighten Photos. I scan multiple at one time, does Photoshop or another CC app have a way to auto separate each photo on that scan into individual JPGs?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |